<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Paradigmas filosóficos : ¿Puede trabajarse kuhnianamente en filosofía? Acerca de “Inconmensurabilidad teórica y comparabilidad empírica

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bernabé, Federico Nahuel

Ginnobili, Santiago

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

It is often assumed that analytic philosophy cannot be treated in a Kuhnian way, since what characterizes philosophical practice is not a disciplinary matrix with paradigmatic exemplars of theoretical and empirical problem solving. We propose to challenge this assumption by arguing that at least in some areas of analytic philosophy one can find disciplinary matrices in the Kuhnian sense and, above all, exemplary cases that give rise to a metatheoretical problem-solving program. In particular, we will focus on meta-theoretical structuralism and its notion of T-theoricity. We will show that the work of historical-philosophical analysis carried out by Lorenzano (2008) is a paradigmatic example that has been replicated by several subsequent works, extending the range of application of the disciplinary matrix.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Bernabé, F.N & Ginnobili, S. (2024) Paradigmas filosóficos: ¿puede trabajarse kuhnianamente en filosofía? Acerca de Inconmensurabilidad teórica y comparabilidad empírica: el caso de la genética clásica” de Pablo Lorenzano. Análisis Filosófico, 44(1), Sup.,63-74

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess