Publication: Paradigmas filosóficos : ¿Puede trabajarse kuhnianamente en filosofía? Acerca de “Inconmensurabilidad teórica y comparabilidad empírica
Loading...
Date
Authors
Bernabé, Federico Nahuel
Ginnobili, Santiago
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico
Abstract
It is often assumed that analytic philosophy cannot be treated in a Kuhnian way, since what characterizes philosophical practice is not a disciplinary matrix with paradigmatic exemplars of theoretical and empirical problem solving. We propose to challenge this assumption by arguing that at least in some areas of analytic philosophy one can find disciplinary matrices in the Kuhnian sense and, above all, exemplary cases that give rise to a metatheoretical problem-solving program. In particular, we will focus on meta-theoretical structuralism and its notion of T-theoricity. We will show that the work of historical-philosophical analysis carried out by Lorenzano (2008) is a paradigmatic example that has been replicated by several subsequent works, extending the range of application of the disciplinary matrix.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Bernabé, F.N & Ginnobili, S. (2024) Paradigmas filosóficos: ¿puede trabajarse kuhnianamente en filosofía? Acerca de Inconmensurabilidad teórica y comparabilidad empírica: el caso de la genética clásica” de Pablo Lorenzano. Análisis Filosófico, 44(1), Sup.,63-74
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
